It comes as state parliament is set to wind back its sitting schedule, with the Marshall Government understood to have flagged as few as one sitting day a month during the coronavirus pandemic.
Lucas declared in 2018 the current four-year term would be his last after four decades in state parliament, but acknowledged today he’d been approached about changing his mind amid the economic turmoil wrought by the coronavirus crisis.
It comes as parliament is set to debate new legislation that would give the Treasurer sweeping new powers to “suspend or modify” existing laws, “if satisfied that [it] is necessary as a result of circumstances brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic or to provide economic stimulus” to cope with the fallout, as InDaily revealed yesterday.
Asked whether he had considered postponing his retirement plans, Lucas said today: “The issue has been raised with me, but I haven’t changed my position.”
He declined to identify who had raised the question with him and, asked whether a request had come from Premier Steven Marshall, said: “I’m not indicating.”
“I’m not really addressing that particular issue – a number of people have raised it with me [but] my answer to you and them is ‘no’,” he said.
“I’ve made it quite clear to all those people who have put the question to me… it’s not an issue I’m thinking about reconsidering. I’ve said no to them privately, and I’m saying no to you publicly.”
He said the question had “not been a major part of my thinking” as he moved “from urgent meeting to urgent meeting to urgent teleconference”.
“I know my use-by date – it’s in two years’ time,” he said.
“So long as the Premier wants me to serve until 2022, I’ll continue to serve [but] we’re still two years away… we obviously hope the global pandemic will be resolved well and truly before then. Yes, there will be a considerable period of recovery afterwards, and the impacts will continue for some time, but I’ve got confidence in Steven and the team – if they’re re-elected in two years’ time – to continue the task.”
Party insiders say the most likely successor in Treasury is current Transport and Infrastructure Minister Stephan Knoll, who was first elected in 2014.
Any move to extend Lucas’s tenure would be problematic, since nominations for the SA Liberals’ Upper House ticket have already closed – although the ballot has been delayed amid coronavirus restrictions banning large gatherings.
State parliament resumed today with a skeleton staff of MPs holding a joint sitting to rubber stamp the Liberal Party’s nomination for a Legislative Council casual vacancy, with Right-winger Nicola Centofanti joining the ranks of the SA Upper House.
It’s understood the Government intends to dramatically curtail the parliamentary sitting schedule after this week, with parliament likely to sit just once a month until the health crisis is resolved.
The Government’s coronavirus measures Bill is set to be introduced later today.
Lucas said while the emergency powers handed to him under the new legislation were stipulated to provide economic stimulus measures “during and after the pandemic”, they were not intended to be invoked once the health crisis had passed, noting that “any changes can only be done with the agreement of the Auditor-General”.
“He accepts the fact – given the circumstances where the budget’s been delayed and we’re in the middle of a global pandemic – that all sorts of decisions have to be made quickly… with agility, flexibility and commonsense,” he said.
“I don’t need or want extraordinary powers beyond the duration of the pandemic… that’s the very least of my issues. The Bill is drafted to give all these extraordinary powers to a whole variety of people for the duration of the pandemic.”
He said the major part of the new law that would extend beyond that time was the exemption of Government officials from civil or criminal liability concerns arising from their application of the new powers.
He said economic stimulus measures would largely involve projects that can be quickly implemented such as previously-outlined road resurfacing and maintenance projects – with a particular focus on regional areas, where “you don’t have compulsory acquisition issues or problems with local residents protesting”.
He said there had been “no consideration at all” to revisiting other transport projects such as a further city or North Adelaide tramline extension.
“All those things you can’t do quickly enough… it’s not going to happen to two or three or four years, so that’s going to give you any [immediate] economic stimulus,” he said.
Want to comment?
Send us an email, making it clear which story you’re commenting on and including your full name (required for publication) and phone number (only for verification purposes). Please put “Reader views” in the subject.
We’ll publish the best comments in a regular “Reader Views” post. Your comments can be brief, or we can accept up to 350 words, or thereabouts.
Make your contribution to independent news
A donation of any size to InDaily goes directly to helping our journalists uncover the facts. South Australia needs more than one voice to guide it forward, and we’d truly appreciate your contribution. Please click below to donate to InDaily.