InDaily InDaily

Support independent Journalism Donate Subscribe
Support independent journalism


Supreme Court "wrong" to intervene in Brexit politics: Boris


A defiant Boris Johnson has hit out at the Supreme Court saying it was “wrong” to intervene in a political matter at a time of “great national controversy” over Brexit.

Print article

The prime minister was forced to cut short his trip to United Nations General Assembly in New York and return to Westminster to face MPs after the court ruled his suspension of parliament was unlawful.

Amid raucous scenes in the Commons chamber, Johnson said parliament was “paralysed” and accused MPs of “sabotaging” Brexit negotiations by seeking to prevent him taking the UK out of the EU on October 31, with or without a deal.

He challenged opposition parties to table a motion of no confidence or back a general election in order to “finally face the day of reckoning with the voters”.

However, he also infuriated many MPs after he suggested the best way to honour the memory of murdered MP Jo Cox – an ardent Remainer who was killed just days before the 2016 referendum – was to “get Brexit done”.

Earlier, there was uproar as he dismissed as “humbug” an appeal from a Labour MP to curb his inflammatory language over Brexit as she recalled what happened to Cox.

Liberal Democrat leader Jo Swinson described his comments as “sickening”.

“Boris Johnson demeaned that office with his words today, and he should apologise immediately for them,” she said.

Johnson was humiliated by Tuesday’s Supreme Court judgment which overturned his advice to the Queen to suspend Parliament until October 14.

However he told MPs it was “absolutely no disrespect to the judiciary to say I thought the court was wrong to pronounce on what was a political question at a time of great national controversy.”

In response, Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn repeated his call for the prime minister to quit.

“After yesterday’s ruling the Prime Minister should have done the honourable thing and resigned,” he said.

Opposition parties will not back an election until they are sure that a no-deal Brexit is off the table and they are suspicious that Johnson will not comply with the terms of the Benn Act which is aimed at delaying Brexit beyond the October 31 deadline if no agreement has been reached.

Downing Street said if the opposition parties did not take up the offer to stage a vote of no-confidence they would take it as a sign MPs did have confidence in the government and a “mandate” to press on with Brexit.

“It is time to put up or shut up,” a Number 10 source said.

A defiant Johnson taunted Corbyn over his refusal to back an election.

“I think the people outside this House understand what is happening,” he said.

“Out of sheer selfishness and political cowardice they are unwilling to move aside and let the people have a say.

“This parliament must either stand aside and let this government get Brexit done, or bring a vote of confidence and finally face the day of reckoning with the voters.”

Corbyn dismissed the Johnson’s words as “bluster from a dangerous prime minister who thinks he is above the law”.

Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon said the SNP would back an election if Johnson requested a Brexit delay.

The response to the court case – including reported comments by Commons Leader Jacob Rees-Mogg describing it as a “constitutional coup” – have caused unease about the government’s attitude to the judiciary.

The resumption of the parliamentary session could cause problems for the Tory conference, which is due to begin on Sunday and stretch until Wednesday.

If opposition MPs refuse to vote for a recess, the conference will have to be rejigged or curtailed, not least because Johnson’s leader’s speech in Manchester would be on Wednesday when he would normally be expected to face Prime Minister’s Questions in Parliament.


Want to comment?

Send us an email, making it clear which story you’re commenting on and including your full name (required for publication) and phone number (only for verification purposes). Please put “Reader views” in the subject.

We’ll publish the best comments in a regular “Reader Views” post. Your comments can be brief, or we can accept up to 350 words, or thereabouts.

InDaily has changed the way we receive comments. Go here for an explanation.


Make a comment View comment guidelines

Local News Matters

Media diversity is under threat in Australia – nowhere more so than in South Australia. The state needs more than one voice to guide it forward and you can help with a donation of any size to InDaily. Your contribution goes directly to helping our journalists uncover the facts. Please click below to help InDaily continue to uncover the facts.

Donate today
Powered by PressPatron

More News stories

Loading next article