Commenting on the story: Poor returns on research sparks inquiries
Having worked in the health research sector for many years, I became concerned when SA’s share of grants and research funding began declining while, at the same time, the university administration and management component of grants received continued to increase.
That is, we were earning less grant money as a proportion of the overall research funding pie, while allocating a greater proportion of this declining revenue to administration and not research.
Perhaps it is time to look again at consolidating our university sector so that our three small universities in SA do not compete with each other to their detriment. – Peter Harvey
A good portion of the issue is that organisations have to spend their money within financial years and therefore fund projects just to be able to get the money again next year.
Happens in all levels of government and their agencies and in their funding schemes.
Poor governance and a lack of openness and transparencies in the many different processes used to evaluate and award projects even within the one organisation leads to issues like the current sports rorts.
Funding is awarded for projects and as long as they spend the required funds then that is fine.
There is no, or very little attention paid to how effectively the money is spent and whether the projects even achieve what they were supposed to.
No system is used to followup and look at what it costs to implement the outcomes of the project and what are the actual benefits of doing the projects, be they economic, social and/or environmental.
Generally these benefits are not even set up in the first place so you would have no idea whether the project was successful at any more than achieving the budgeted expenditure, but then again isn’t that what they actually want to achieve and get their bonuses for? – Graeme Crook
Want to comment?
Send us an email, making it clear which story you’re commenting on and including your full name (required for publication) and phone number (only for verification purposes). Please put “Reader views” in the subject.
We’ll publish the best comments in a regular “Reader Views” post. Your comments can be brief, or we can accept up to 350 words, or thereabouts.
We value local independent journalism. We hope you do too.
InDaily provides valuable, local independent journalism in South Australia. As a news organisation it offers an alternative to The Advertiser, a different voice and a closer look at what is happening in our city and state for free. Any contribution to help fund our work is appreciated. Please click below to become an InDaily supporter.