Commenting on the story: Art Gallery bequests, payroll tax among ‘windfalls’ behind $289m budget surplus
So all Art gallery bequests are budget income items.
Why, as a private person, donate ? – Eric van Kruyssen
It amazes me that Art Gallery bequests can contribute to a budget surplus!
I think that is creative accounting.
Mr Lucas doesn’t however have any Lotteries Commision or Motor Accident Commision revenue, because Tom snaffled all that. – Bill Hecker
Does the Treasurer mean that because of the bequests that he does not need to give the Art Gallery as much funding as budgeted?
If that assumption is correct, it seems that the Government is whiteanting the value of bequests.
Using bequests as an excuse to avoid Government funding is very poor.
Perhaps the Treasurer can clarify. – Paul Turner
How can State Treasurer Rob Lucas possibly include the $36.9 million bequest to the Art Gallery of South Australia as being part of his alleged Budget surplus?
That money belongs to the Art Gallery and not the State Government.
Lucas is simply playing with numbers.
The bequest to the Art Gallery is for the Art Gallery to use to purchase works of art, not to be absorbed into general revenue by this increasingly inept State Liberal Government. – Robert McCormick
Really hard to be pleased about a surplus that involves taking away so much from essential (and ‘non-essential’) services.
What value, for example, has human life compared with budget surpluses, referring to the death of patients during ‘ramping’ of ambulances? – Cathy Chua
Commenting on the story: Central Market Arcade’s $400m redevelopment
I am a former South Australian living in Perth. The Central Market is the first place to go for our fruit, vegetables, cheeses and specialty meats on our visits with family.
The WA Government has taken away so many old buildings and destroyed a heritage that was nothing like that in South Australia.
One of Adelaide’s charms is its old buildings and the Central Market remains just that – a charming environment to shop, meet friends, have a coffee and snack, buy flowers and soak up the atmosphere.
What is being proposed will be a sterile, glitzy building that will be no different from any other overdeveloped city shopping block in other states.
Keep your charm, your heritage, Adelaide – or you will rue the day. – Margaret Sargent
Here’s an idea: let’s spend $400 million over the next 3 years to plonk a 35-storey tower on top of Central Market.
We’ll close off 260 car parks in the process and ask shoppers to backpack their groceries 250 metres to a carpark up the road – hey, but don’t worry, it won’t really matter because shoppers will be as rare as the Central Market traders once the impact of such a disruption rips the heart out of their businesses.
And travellers the world over will beat a path to our door just to see the apartments – why waste time going to the Barossa when you can see a 35-storey building!
And will the wait be worth it? I mean, is any of the $400ml going to the spent on refurbishing the market? Anything at all? Ummm…nope.
That’s so Adelaide…the home of the one-way freeway does it again. – Kevin Whitford
Want to comment?
Send us an email, making it clear which story you’re commenting on and including your full name (required for publication) and phone number (only for verification purposes). Please put “Reader views” in the subject.
We’ll publish the best comments in a regular “Reader Views” post. Your comments can be brief, or we can accept up to 350 words, or thereabouts.
InDaily has changed the way we receive comments. Go here for an explanation.
We value local independent journalism. We hope you do too.
InDaily provides valuable, local independent journalism in South Australia. As a news organisation it offers an alternative to The Advertiser, a different voice and a closer look at what is happening in our city and state for free. Any contribution to help fund our work is appreciated. Please click below to become an InDaily supporter.