Another pool of cash for ageing Aquatic Centre
Commenting on the story: City council considers $2m Aquatic Centre renovation, $2m putt-putt for North Adelaide
I have no objections against the refurbishment of the aquatic centre.
But the $2.2 million dollars for a putt-putt course should be spent on alleviating the homelessness problem in the city. – Mike Lesiw
At around the turn of the century a memorable battle was fought by the then state peer organisation SwimmingSA to have the Adelaide Aquatic Centre upgraded, and for the headquarters of state swimming to remain at North Adelaide with a city/parkland focus.
The matter became entirely political which saw campaign promises deliver a new aquatic centre at Oaklands Park (Marion).
No one listened to well-founded arguments that the parklands site was historic and iconic and currently (then) attracted regular attendance by students who wished to remain in the North Adelaide precinct for food and accommodation, not to mention being a more central location for the many volunteer technical officials who travelled from Adelaide Hills, Gawler, northern suburbs and Henley.
It appears good planning now takes a very poor second place to political promises as we observe election impacts on sporting facilities, aged care and hospital facilities. The rezoning of Mount Barker, Freeling, Buckland Park etc. were yet again political decisions, not examples of good planning.
So how do we get good planning decisions based on community consultation, when despite the new community engagement charter, the people and the councils which represent them are not in charge of state coffers nor in any position to pay the piper? – Carol Bailey
Adelaide city council needs to consult with Victor Harbor who have a vibrant aquatic centre.
The Fleurieu centre has great facilities and is highly popular with all ages.
Forget the mini golf, just focus on health and aquatic activities. It should sell itself. – Jenny Esots
New gallery needs a single guiding hand
Commenting on the story: Kaurna concerns over Aboriginal art and culture gallery
As to the gallery proposal, my observation is that an organisational structure should be developed that is independent of the AGSA, the SA Museum and any other outfit that feels it should “own” this project.
Co-operation between institutions is a very appealing sentiment, but “competitive tension” between institutions is a more powerful means of generating interest, audiences and outcomes.
Back office functions such as IT and HR could certainly be shared, but curatorial activities, programming, marketing and benefaction are best handled by the institution running the show. – Michael Zerman
Want to comment?
Send us an email, making it clear which story you’re commenting on and including your full name (required for publication) and phone number (only for verification purposes). Please put “Reader views” in the subject.
We’ll publish the best comments in a regular “Reader Views” post. Your comments can be brief, or we can accept up to 350 words, or thereabouts.
InDaily has changed the way we receive comments. Go here for an explanation.
Make your contribution to independent news
A donation of any size to InDaily goes directly to helping our journalists uncover the facts. South Australia needs more than one voice to guide it forward, and we’d truly appreciate your contribution. Please click below to donate to InDaily.