Commenting on the opinion piece: Up the creek: why the SA desalination deal makes no sense
While I commend the thoughtful investigative journalism this article brings, I would like to bring to attention a fact seemingly not quite grasped by the creators of the desal “deal”, nor the commentators that report on it.
Yes the running cost is high, but that is because of the retail ‘flat rate’ type of electricity costs.
If the government and administrators of the desal could purchase electricity off the wholesale market by obtaining their own retail licence or partnering with one that would pass on the highly variable market rate, then the plant could run only when the cost is below a particular price.
This could save over 50%.
Not only that, but it would have ‘green’ implications too because typically when the price is low, it is because large amounts of wind and solar are feeding into the grid.
It’s a win-win, and its not rocket science.
All it takes is a bit of insight and determination from decision makers and influencers. – Ben Stephens
Commenting on the story: No land tax vote as budget windfall dwindles
Clearly this land tax bill will have so much tape holding it together that this Treasurer should take himself and his advisors to the nearest checkpoint and remove himself from government.
He’s playing with people’s livelihoods and thinks a quick fix will solve everyone’s problems.
Investment has stopped and the state has lagged through it.
Not what I voted for. – Harry Milochis
There will never be fairness, transparency or equity in the assessment of land tax until:
1. All land is taxed
2. Land values are not used to assess land tax
3. Land tax is assessed on a proportion of the council rates paid on each property. – David Singer
Want to comment?
Send us an email, making it clear which story you’re commenting on and including your full name (required for publication) and phone number (only for verification purposes). Please put “Reader views” in the subject.
We’ll publish the best comments in a regular “Reader Views” post. Your comments can be brief, or we can accept up to 350 words, or thereabouts.
InDaily has changed the way we receive comments. Go here for an explanation.
We value local independent journalism. We hope you do too.
InDaily provides valuable, local independent journalism in South Australia. As a news organisation it offers an alternative to The Advertiser, a different voice and a closer look at what is happening in our city and state for free. Any contribution to help fund our work is appreciated. Please click below to become an InDaily supporter.