InDaily InDaily

Support independent Journalism Donate Subscribe
Support independent journalism


Richardson: Tough times at the Tele Town Hall


Comments Print article

Story Timeline

The Gillman debacle:

After the success of this week’s ‘Tele Town Hall’, with a Jay Weatherill ‘bot’ cold-calling thousands of voters ahead of a mega-phone-forum, the State Government decided to repeat the process, with its three most senior ministers stationed in a call centre taking questions from electors. Here is a transcript of the event:

JAYBOT: All right. Welcome to my Tele Town Hall. There are 100,000 of you on the line with me right now waiting to ask me questions.

JOHN RAU: Um, actually it’s more like 6000.

JAYBOT: 6000, is it? Exactly the same number of jobs we’ve created at our oil and gas hub at Gillman.

JOHN RAU: Er…no. That’s more like…well, zero.

JAYBOT: Zero, 6000. I’m not great with numbers. I’m more about the vibe. What do you think, C-Bomb?

TOM KOUTSANTONIS: (Swears incoherently for several seconds)

JAYBOT: Exactly. Anyway, let’s take some calls.

CALLER: Hi, Jaybot. Does the Treasurer always swear like that?

JAYBOT: Oh, sure, it’s pretty routine, really. But it’s usually directed at me in private. I’ve never witnessed him swearing in front of other public servants.

CALLER: What about in cabinet?

JAYBOT: Well, what happens in cabinet stays in cabinet.

TK: Well, that was a f***in useless question. Next!

CALLER: You’re a disgrace, mate, a bloody disgrace.

TK: F***in hell, who let Duncan McFetridge on the line?

JR: We always end up with some Liberal or other infiltrating our deliberative democracy initiatives. I’m sick of all these left-wingers informing our policy process!

JAYBOT: We need to have a word with the organiser.

TK: Maybe I should do it, being the government’s head kicker…for lack of a better word.

JAYBOT: You’ve never been short of a better word, C-Bomb. Go to it.

TK: (Dials phone) Hey, you bunch of useless c***s! There’s a Liberal in our Tele Town Hall. What the f*** do I employ you for? For Christ’s sakes, what are you doing? Da da da da da.*

(Hangs up) I think they took that on board.

JR: I hope you weren’t seeking to influence them too much.

JAYBOT: I thought it was fairly subtle.

TK: Well, I don’t claim to be perfect, and, you know, I do occasionally slip.

JAYBOT: Well, no-one’s perfect. Besides me, I mean. Let’s take another call.

CALLER: Hi Jaybot, I run a business and I think the Government needs to do more to create jobs. Can’t you provide more contracts to local firms?

JAYBOT: Great suggestion! We’ll incorporate that into our Northern Jobs Plan. What a brilliant idea this Tele Town Hall was! Next caller.

CALLER: Hey there guys. I run a business, and I wish Government would stand aside and let the private sector get on with things. We need less Government interference.

JAYBOT: Another great idea! We’ll adopt that as policy too.

JR: Um, Jaybot. Doesn’t that policy fundamentally contradict the last policy we adopted?

TK: It does? For f***’s sake…

JAYBOT: Never mind, this way we can have our cake and eat it too. Next caller.

Jay Weatherill facing the media this week: "His demeanor is of a man perpetually annoyed with the travails of electioneering." Photo: Nat Rogers/inDaily

JayBot and C-Bomb. Photo: Nat Rogers/InDaily

CALLER: Hi Premier, I’d like you to do something about manufacturing in the north.

JAYBOT: Great idea! What did you have in mind?

CALLER: Um… how about something new in the transport space?

JAYBOT: Space? You mean like rocket-ships?

CALLER: No, like driverless cars or…

JAYBOT: What about hoverboards?


JAYBOT: That’s it! Let’s fund a pilot hoverboard project. Right now! C-Bomb, I’m putting you in charge of this one.

TK: F***.

JAYBOT: Ok, one last caller.

CALLER: Hi Jaybot, I have one question… How is this Gillman business different from the Motorola affair?

JAYBOT: Well, I think it’s the absolute opposite. I think the problem there was John Olsen should have been upfront about the fact he’d done some side-deal, and he wasn’t. Whereas we’ve been absolutely clear that we weren’t going out to tender and we were doing that in the public interest.

CALLER: Not according to Bruce Lander. Or the chief executive of Renewal SA.

JAYBOT: And also, Motorola was about phones. So that was completely different. And also, no-one’s resigned over Gillman.

CALLER: Not yet… But it’s the same principle surely? You did a deal with one company to the exclusion of due process.

JAYBOT: Well, I’m not going to apologise for giving a couple of young entrepreneurs a go!

JR: Um…actually, Premier, Stephen Gerlach’s no spring chicken.

JAYBOT: I meant ‘young’ relative to the Jurassic era.

JR: Anyway, we still got a great deal: the price being offered by Adelaide Capital Partners for that land was good value, full stop! Right, C-Bomb?

TK: I’ve got no f***in idea.

JAYBOT: Actually, it was a bonus that we got good value for the land. It wasn’t our objective.

CALLER: So what was the objective?

JAYBOT: Jobs, of course.

CALLER: But there aren’t any jobs.

JAYBOT: Sure there are. I’m still Premier, John’s still Attorney and C-Bomb’s the Treasurer.

TK: F***.

CALLER: So, it wasn’t about job creation as much as job retention.

JAYBOT: Actually, I think we’re out of time.

CALLER: I think so too.

Tom Richardson is a senior journalist at InDaily. His political column is published on Fridays.

The JayBot story is true – read it here.

*This alleged quote comes directly from the ICAC report into the Gillman land sale (Koutsantonis denies using the “C-bomb”).

Make a comment View comment guidelines

Local News Matters

Media diversity is under threat in Australia – nowhere more so than in South Australia. The state needs more than one voice to guide it forward and you can help with a donation of any size to InDaily. Your contribution goes directly to helping our journalists uncover the facts. Please click below to help InDaily continue to uncover the facts.

Donate today
Powered by PressPatron


Show comments Hide comments
Will my comment be published? Read the guidelines.

More Opinion stories

Loading next article