Adelaide's independent news


"It was important to clarify the situation": Chapman explains ICAC statement


Attorney-General Vickie Chapman says it would be “appropriate” to co-operate if police launch a formal investigation into whether or not she breached the ICAC Act, but has ignored questions about whether or not she would stand aside in that instance.

Comments Print article

 The Attorney-General has been under scrutiny since releasing a statement linking ICAC to a staffing issue at Renewal SA, with anti-corruption Commissioner Bruce Lander subsequently revealing he instructed her not to make any such statement, although he authorised media to publish it.

Chapman, who is also currently Acting Premier, did the morning radio rounds today, during which she claimed she made her initial statement because “it was important to clarify the situation given the further inquiry at the time”.

She spent yesterday fending off Opposition questions following a report in The Advertiser claiming police are conducting a “preliminary assessment” of available evidence to determine “whether a full investigation is warranted”.

Asked by David Penberthy on FIVEaa whether “it would be better for you to stand aside while any kind of police inquiry is underway”, Chapman replied: “If there was an investigation of this matter, then of course co-operation in any of these aspects would be appropriate.”

However, she did not address whether she would step aside in that instance.

Asked to clarify her position today, her office referred InDaily to her media conference yesterday, in which she said she was “not going to speculate about ‘ifs’ or hypotheticals”.

She told FIVEaa that “at this stage, at best we have an anonymous claim that there’s been a police assessment”.

“Even if the ALP, the Opposition, sent materials to the police to look at it, any appropriate assessment should be undertaken by them, but that doesn’t mean we stop the business of the state and just walk away while they play games over in the corner,” she said.

Penberthy himself has argued the issue is a storm in a teacup, suggesting it didn’t matter if the Attorney had breached the law because it was a “stupid law [that] has no bearing on anybody’s life here in SA”, and criticising Labor for pursuing the matter given “the ministerial standards it set in its own lengthy and chequered recent history in office”.

Chapman says she has received “senior, comprehensive” Crown Law advice, which “indicates that there has been no breach”.

On ABC Radio Adelaide this morning, she was asked repeatedly whether she had Lander’s authority to make her initial statement and refused to directly answer the question.

Look, quite clearly this issue’s been traversed many times… I’ve had the advice on this matter. The position’s quite clear to me and that is there’s been no breach of the Act.”

Asked again by host David Bevan whether she had Lander’s authority to release her statement, she said: “I understand what you’re saying in relation to that [but] the questioning over and over again about the same issue… authority to do, compliance with the Act, these are all things that have been traversed.”

“I quite accept that it’s reasonable for people to ask the questions, as they have in the Parliament or indeed publicly, but you know the same answer is there… what’s really important to me is that whether there’s, you know, a headline about a claim of a police probe, all those sorts of things… I’m available if the Police want to speak to me.

“They haven’t actually asked to speak to me or raised the issue at all, but the fact is that if these things occur then of course it’s important that as a public officer I be accountable [to] them, but at the moment just because the Labor Party are out there kicking on pressing this doesn’t mean that it’s either accurate or right.”

Asked twice more, she said “obviously the implication of different aspects of what’s happened on the day have got to be dealt with in aggregate and I’ve dealt with it in aggregate”.

“Because when you deal with these matters it’s a question of has there been a breach?” she continued amid further questioning.

“If so, what are the circumstances of the breach? Is there any other remedy or explanation? All those things… I start from the presumption that, and I hope everyone does, that there has to be an established breach to be able to answer to, and there hasn’t been.”

Asked by presenter Ali Clarke why she decided to release her initial statement, Chapman replied: “Well, I think it was important to clarify the situation given the further inquiry at the time, remembering that there is always the objective of this confidentiality aspect of an inquiry to try and minimise the risk of unfair reputational damage and I think that’s got to be respected.”

“We will always try and work, even with reforms, to make sure that we manage that,” Chapman said.

She said she did not “have an issue at all” with Labor referring the matter to police, because politicians “have to be in the firing line, and we are”.

As she did the radio rounds, the SA Liberal Party’s social media account @SALibMedia tweeted out a clip featuring questions by Labor frontbencher Tom Koutsantonis during a budget estimates committee interrogation of Planning Minister Stephan Knoll.

A screenshot of the now-deleted tweet.

The tweet, which was swiftly deleted, contained dialogue that was not published in media reports at the time of the exchange, due to legal advice.

Asked whether the tweet contained material that may have breached the ICAC Act, a Government spokesman said they would “not comment on the content of a tweet that was posted and immediately deleted this morning”.

We value local independent journalism. We hope you do too.

InDaily provides valuable, local independent journalism in South Australia. As a news organisation it offers an alternative to The Advertiser, a different voice and a closer look at what is happening in our city and state for free. Any contribution to help fund our work is appreciated. Please click below to become an InDaily supporter.

Powered by PressPatron


Show comments Hide comments
Will my comment be published? Read the guidelines.

More Politics stories

Loading next article