InDaily InDaily

Support independent Journalism Donate Subscribe
Support independent journalism

Politics

Campaign Diary: Marshall's portfolio promise + the "obese" public service

Politics

In today’s Campaign Diary, we reveal the key portfolio that Steven Marshall will take on should he win the keys to the Premier’s office, Nick Xenophon acts to head off the major parties’ preference crunch, and Business SA’s election manifesto hones in on the “morbidly obese” public sector.

Comments
Comments Print article

Marshall’s Defence

Campaign Diary can reveal that Liberal leader Steven Marshall will take on the crucial defence industries portfolio if his party forms government.

Marshall, who has already indicated he would be responsible for indigenous affairs as Premier, has been focused this week on announcements about how a Liberal Government would make the most of the multi-billion-dollar shipbuilding program to come for South Australia.

Part of his sales pitch is his capacity to deal with his party colleagues in the Federal Government, which holds the big bucket of defence cash.

And he was showing off these connections this week.

Yesterday, he appeared with federal education minister Simon Birmingham, a South Australian, to talk about maximising jobs in the industry and building local skills.

Today, he was alongside another South Australian, federal defence industries minister Christopher Pyne, to release a policy for maximising defence industry export opportunities for local businesses.

Key measures included competing to have the biennial Land Forces conference in 2020 and then making Adelaide the permanent home of the international defence expo, measures to help local SMEs in the sector, re-establishing a network of trade offices overseas, and establishing a defence industry scholarship fund.

Xenophon’s new pitch: ‘Vote 2: SA Best’

That ubiquitous SA best jingle may be urging voters to “forget the rest”, but Nick Xenophon today revealed a slightly different campaign theme as he begins a desperate rearguard action to combat Labor’s decision to preference against his party in 23 of the state’s 47 lower house seats.

Given SA Best’s hopes for success have always rested on the likelihood that their candidates could finish second in a raft of seats and surf ahead on preferences, the ALP’s move could effectively lock the fledgling party out of 23 electorates – a devastating blow for a party fielding only 36 candidates.

With the Liberals likely to pull a similar move, Xenophon today road-tested his new mantra.

“Our plea will be to the voters who… don’t vote for SA Best: give us your second preferences, because we’re genuinely a party of the political centre,” he told reporters.

“And if the major parties tell them anything else – through a split ticket or anything else they‘re doing – they are being hypocrites. Our pitch to voters from now on will be: ‘be very wary of what the major parties are putting up in preference strategies’. We are a party of the political centre: if someone votes for one of the major parties first, they should come to us second – before they go to the major parties.”

Xenophon said his party’s “whole campaign strategy has been predicated [on the assumption] both major parties hate SA Best more than they hate each other, because they’re a cosy duopoly”.

He reiterated that SA Best will run an open preference ticket on March 17.

German battery producer to move to SA

Labor’s focus on renewable energy continued today.

Premier Jay Weatherill announced this morning that the world’s largest producer of household battery and solar energy storage systems, German company sonnen, was planning to move its Australian manufacturing base from Sydney to Adelaide.

The move is expected to create 430 jobs in installation, manufacturing and administration.

He said the location of a battery manufacturing centre was yet to be determined.

Sonnen Australia/New Zealand managing director Chris Parratt said South Australia was the best environment to sell storage systems in the world right now.

He said the company had chosen to move to South Australia primarily because of its skilled workforce.

“Firstly and most importantly the skilled workforce that we have here (encouraged the move),” he said.

“The second thing is the access to ports to access our Asian markets … and, the market here, the overall environment is the best in the world to sell energy storage.”

Meanwhile, Labor has pledged $100 million to fund low-interest loans for residential battery and solar systems across SA.

Liberal Leader Steven Marshall said Labor was playing catchup because the Opposition had announced a similar scheme last year.

The Liberal Party’s energy policy involves a $100 million subsidy scheme for home solar batteries, a $200 million interconnector with New South Wales, a reverse-auction mechanism aimed at unlocking available South Australian energy generation during periods of exceptional demand on the grid, a ban on electricity companies charging exit fees for consumer energy contracts and a removal of the state’s renewable energy target.

Business SA’s prescription for reducing the bloat

The state’s key business lobby group, Business SA, today released a 100-page “Charter for a more Prosperous South Australia” which, it says, would make South Australia a more competitive state – should the policy prescriptions be adopted.

The areas for attention include fixing the state’s energy problems, cutting payroll tax, reviving debate on nuclear waste storage, establishing an independent infrastructure authority, committing to population growth and taking a good hard look at the public sector.

On that last point, it wants to cut the number of state politicians and ministers, amalgamate councils in metropolitan Adelaide, and fix the wages gap between the public and private sectors.

CEO Nigel McBride says South Australia “should be a thriving state with a bright future”.

“Instead, we have a morbidly obese public sector, payroll tax rates which penalise our successful small and medium-sized businesses, the most expensive power in our nation, and an ageing population and slow growth,” he said.

He backed his claims about the public sector with a report commissioned form the SA Centre for Economic Studies (SACES).

Michael O’Neil from SACES said the state had a significantly larger public sector – proportionally – than other states and jurisdictions overseas.

“But there is no evidence that South Australia has a more dynamic, wealth-creating economy than other states, or that we have a more effective or efficient public sector,” he said.

“This is not a debate about small or big government. It is a debate about improvements in the quality of government policy and service delivery to ultimately advance community welfare of all South Australians.”

Business SA’s charter includes the following chart, showing how public sector employment in SA compares to other states.

However, it’s likely to get much traction on this point – both the Liberals and Labor aren’t keen on opening up the possibility of public service job cuts in the midst of a campaign (although both want to impose an “efficiency dividend” on departments).

Despite his own Treasurer’s stated determination to extract “efficiencies” from the public service, Premier Jay Weatherill went on the attack today.

“Business SA has joined with two versions of the Liberal Party with Nick Xenophon and the Liberal Party itself in posing a massive risk to health services, education services, schools and hospitals,” he said.

“There’s one side of politics that is proposing very large tax giveaways that have to be funded.

“It’s got to come from the public service. What does that mean? Deep cuts to health and education – that means schools and hospitals.”

When asked if he would rule out further cuts by Labor to the public sector, he said: “You’ll see how we deal with that later in the campaign. But what I can tell you is this, we will not be engaged in massive cuts to public services including schools and hospitals, health and education.

“We’ve already made some announcements about efficiencies and you’ll see how we respond. The size of the cuts that are necessary to fund the promises that have already been made, and they haven’t finished yet, in terms of these tax giveaways are extraordinary.

“We only have razor thin surpluses.”

On that final point, it might be worth remembering that Weatherill’s spending promises in the first week of the campaign so far are approaching the $3 billion mark.

– Additional reporting by Stephanie Richards and Tom Richardson

Make a comment View comment guidelines

Local News Matters

Media diversity is under threat in Australia – nowhere more so than in South Australia. The state needs more than one voice to guide it forward and you can help with a donation of any size to InDaily. Your contribution goes directly to helping our journalists uncover the facts. Please click below to help InDaily continue to uncover the facts.

Donate today
Powered by PressPatron

Comments

Show comments Hide comments
Will my comment be published? Read the guidelines.

More Politics stories

Loading next article