Dan Oakes and Sam Clark are facing Australian Federal Police scrutiny over their involvement in stories about Australia’s special forces allegedly carrying out unlawful killings in Afghanistan.
A letter from the Australian Federal Police to the journalists was emailed on April 1 – two months before AFP officers raided the ABC’s Sydney headquarters seeking leaked documents relating to the stories.
The ABC said the email stated the AFP was “requesting your consent to a forensic procedure being the copying of your finger and palm prints”, with the two journalists being suspects in relation to three alleged offences.
The broadcaster’s head of investigations John Lyons said the revelation proved the men were police targets as part of the investigation.
“I haven’t ever heard of journalists being asked for fingerprints,” he told ABC News.
“This quite shocks me because it’s the sort of thing that if someone has burgled a house, people try to get fingerprints to find out who was the thief.”
The ABC declined to comment further on Monday, beyond confirming the AFP request had been received.
The revelation followed a report in the Sydney Morning Herald which said the AFP had sought from Qantas the travel details of Oakes.
The ABC’s managing director David Anderson has asked for the investigation to be dropped and is pursuing legal action to declare the search warrant involved in the raid invalid.
It is also seeking a permanent injunction stopping the AFP accessing the electronic files removed from Ultimo on a sealed USB stick.
Labor’s home affairs spokeswoman Kristina Keneally blamed the coalition for not doing enough to protect press freedom.
“If journalism is not a crime in Australia, why is the Morrison government treating journalists like criminal suspects?” she said in a statement.
The parliamentary joint committee on intelligence and security has begun an inquiry into the impact of the exercise of law enforcement and intelligence powers on the freedom of the press.
Want to comment?
Send us an email, making it clear which story you’re commenting on and including your full name (required for publication) and phone number (only for verification purposes). Please put “Reader views” in the subject.
We’ll publish the best comments in a regular “Reader Views” post. Your comments can be brief, or we can accept up to 350 words, or thereabouts.
InDaily has changed the way we receive comments. Go here for an explanation.
Help our journalists uncover the facts
In times like these InDaily provides valuable, local independent journalism in South Australia. As a news organisation it offers an alternative to The Advertiser, a different voice and a closer look at what is happening in our city and state for free. Any contribution to help fund our work is appreciated. Please click below to donate to InDaily.