InDaily InDaily

Support independent Journalism Donate Subscribe
Support independent journalism


City councillor under investigation, Ombudsman confirms


The South Australian Ombudsman has launched an investigation into whether an Adelaide city councillor has breached conflict of interest laws.

Comments Print article

Story Timeline

Sandy Wilkinson

As InDaily revealed last month, area councillor Sandy Wilkinson voted for a motion late last year which he said may indirectly financially benefit his own business.

Wilkinson, a heritage consultant, voted to increase a council subsidy for professional services related to heritage restoration.

He insists his actions were entirely appropriate and has produced legal advice concluding his voting did not constitute a conflict of interest.

South Australian Ombudsman Wayne Lines has now confirmed he is investigating the councillor.

“We have commenced an investigation,” Lines told InDaily.

“These investigations commonly take four to six months [to complete].

“I won’t be able to divulge further details.”

Under the Local Government Act, a councillor who votes on a matter where she or he has a material conflict of interest can be fined up to $5000 – where there is no intention to gain a benefit from the vote.

A councillor can be imprisoned for up to four years, or fined up to $15,000, if there is intention to gain a benefit.

A majority of city councillors, including Wilkinson, voted in November 2016 to increase the subsidy for home owners restoring their heritage properties under the council’s Heritage Incentives Scheme – from 50 per cent of professional services fees to 75 per cent of professional services fees (capped at $10,000).

Area councillor Sandy Wilkinson. Photo: ACC

Area councillor Sandy Wilkinson. Photo: ACC

Wilkinson argued during the November 15 meeting that the professional services fee subsidy results in “more good conservation work” occurring.

“That’s where people need the additional incentive to actually do that part of it,” he said.

“I think that this is a component which people are sometimes reluctant to, sort of, pay to get assistance for, and when they’ve got somebody who is providing that service they often then do more conservation works and they do it properly and authentically.

“It results in better conservation outcomes and more good conservation work actually happening.”

Wilkinson told InDaily he voted for the motion because “it’s important that the council is doing everything it can to encourage people to be restoring their heritage buildings in Adelaide”.

“That’s where I’m coming from,” he added.

InDaily is not suggesting that councillor Wilkinson intended to gain a benefit from the vote.

Wilkinson was first elected to the Adelaide City Council in 2007.





Make a comment View comment guidelines

Local News Matters

Media diversity is under threat in Australia – nowhere more so than in South Australia. The state needs more than one voice to guide it forward and you can help with a donation of any size to InDaily. Your contribution goes directly to helping our journalists uncover the facts. Please click below to help InDaily continue to uncover the facts.

Donate today
Powered by PressPatron


Show comments Hide comments
Will my comment be published? Read the guidelines.

More Local stories

Loading next article