The government had faced days of criticism after the mathematical model used to assess grade predictions made by teachers lowered those marks for almost 40 per cent of students taking their main school-leaving exams.
Students will now be awarded the grade that their teachers had predicted for them based on past performance, Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s government said on Monday.
“I am sorry for the distress this has caused young people and their parents but hope this announcement will now provide the certainty and reassurance they deserve,” Education Secretary Gavin Williamson said.
He promised last week there would be no U-turn.
A snap opinion poll by YouGov showed 75 per cent of respondents thought the government had handled the situation badly and 40 per cent thought Williamson should resign.
Some students have been protesting against the initial results.
Asked if he would resign, Williamson said: “I think what those youngsters wanted to see was action being taken.”
The chaotic handling of the grades has been felt as far afield as Egypt and Pakistan as some schools there rely on British assessments to secure internationally recognised qualifications.
The algorithm will also be dropped for results for separate exams taken mostly by 15- and 16-year-old students.
The dispute has damaged Johnson’s core message to voters – that he wanted to get rid of barriers to achievement and help those from poorer backgrounds and areas fulfil their potential.
Some students missed out on university places after they were downgraded several levels by the regulator’s initial model.
“These were problems that were staring the government in the face for months and the government has been slow and incompetent,” opposition Labour Party leader Keir Starmer said.
Williamson said he was lifting a cap on the number of students that universities can accept but it is unclear how universities will handle the unprecedented revision of grades.
The Russell Group of leading British universities said it needed urgent clarification on additional government support.
Analysis of the algorithm showed it had resulted in “manifest injustice” of favouring students in fee-paying private schools, said Paul Johnson, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies think-tank, writing for the Times.
Want to comment?
Send us an email, making it clear which story you’re commenting on and including your full name (required for publication) and phone number (only for verification purposes). Please put “Reader views” in the subject.
We’ll publish the best comments in a regular “Reader Views” post. Your comments can be brief, or we can accept up to 350 words, or thereabouts.
Make your contribution to independent news
A donation of any size to InDaily goes directly to helping our journalists uncover the facts. South Australia needs more than one voice to guide it forward, and we’d truly appreciate your contribution. Please click below to donate to InDaily.