Pell was convicted behind closed doors on five child sexual abuse charges in December 2018 – and acquitted by the High Court this year.
Suppression orders in place because of a pending second trial, which was later dropped, meant his conviction could not be reported until months later.
But a number of media outlets published information about the conviction of a high-profile Australian and referenced court orders.
Victoria’s Director of Public Prosecutions Kerri Judd QC has charged 11 corporations and 19 individuals with contempt over the publications, including The Advertiser in Adelaide and one of its editors.
Barrister Matt Collins QC, who is representing all 30 accused, told Victoria’s Supreme Court on Tuesday multiple trials are likely to be sought.
“At present it appears to us there are 13 separate controversies and on the face of it, it would to an injustice to have journalists for rival news organisations to face trial at the same time,” he said on Tuesday.
All would be heard by a judge alone.
Collins said his clients were anxious for the case to be resolved.
“They’ve had these matters hanging over their heads for far too long,” he said.
Justice John Dixon agreed the case, which has been going for more than a year, was dragging on too long.
He noted it seemed the parties hadn’t agreed to any facts in the case, noting the prosecution argument that Pell was a high-profile Australian hadn’t been accepted by the defence.
But Collins said while that seemed an uncontroversial statement, the status of Pell’s profile in Darwin, Perth or anywhere else outside Victoria was irrelevant to the case.
He said given the serious contempt charges being faced, they couldn’t admit such a bold allegation.
But prosecution lawyer Lisa De Ferrari SC said the suppression orders over the case applied Australia-wide, so it was relevant.
If convicted, organisations face significant fines while individuals face up to five years in prison.
Collins previously described the charges as “serious as it gets” said guilty findings could have a “chilling effect” on open justice.
Dixon listed November 9 for the first trial, but flagged the possibility it could happen sooner.
“I’ve got a holiday booked in Spain in September – so I’ll be around,” he joked.
“We’ll just have to juggle this and see how we go, but let’s keep it moving forward.”
The media outlets, editors and reporters accused of contempt
The Herald and Weekly Times Pty Ltd
Charis Chang, news.com.au senior reporter
News Life Media Pty Ltd
Queensland Newspapers Pty Ltd
Sam Weir, Courier-Mail editor
The Geelong Advertiser Pty Ltd
Andrew Piva, Geelong Advertiser digital editor
Nationwide News Pty Ltd
Ben English, Daily Telegraph editor
Lachlan Hastings, News Corp online editor
Advertiser Newspapers Pty Ltd
Michael Owen-Brown, Adelaide Advertiser digital editor
The Age Company Pty Ltd
Alex Lavelle, The Age editor
Patrick O’Neil, The Age news editor
Michael Bachelard, The Age and Sydney Morning Herald foreign editor, The Age investigations editor
Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd
Lisa Davies, Sydney Morning Herald editor
Michael Stutchbury, Australian Financial Review editor-in-chief
Patrick Durkin, Australian Financial Review Melbourne bureau chief
Mamamia.com.au Pty Ltd
Jessica Chambers, Mamamia content producer
Allure Media Pty Ltd
Simon Thomsen, former Business Insider associate editor
Macquarie Media Limited
Chris Smith, 2GB broadcaster
Nine Entertainment Co Pty Ltd
Lara Vella, Today reporter
Christine Ahern, Today reporter
Deborah Knight, Today host
Source: Supreme Court of Victoria – job descriptions above as they were at the time of the alleged offences
Want to comment?
Send us an email, making it clear which story you’re commenting on and including your full name (required for publication) and phone number (only for verification purposes). Please put “Reader views” in the subject.
We’ll publish the best comments in a regular “Reader Views” post. Your comments can be brief, or we can accept up to 350 words, or thereabouts.
Local News Matters
Media diversity is under threat in Australia – nowhere more so than in South Australia. The state needs more than one voice to guide it forward and you can help with a donation of any size to InDaily. Your contribution goes directly to helping our journalists uncover the facts. Please click below to help InDaily continue to uncover the facts.