The closure of all winery premises to the public – even for takeaway sales – from midnight last night follows a cluster of COVID-19 cases linked to the Barossa Valley and Coonawarra.
A spokesperson for the South Australian Police said under the Emergency Management Act 2004 the State Coordinator had restricted the public from entering the premises of “wineries with cellar doors and restaurants attached to them”.
“Wineries are major tourist attractions and as a holiday period approaches, travel to wine regions is discouraged in order to protect these areas from a potential influx of tourists and spread of COVID-19,” the spokesperson said.
“Wineries that sell food commercially to supermarkets and retail stores are still permitted to produce and sell products, but food products must be transported to retail outlets by commercial freight or the winery itself.”
The new measures follow an order on March 24 stopping cellar doors from providing tastings – but allowed take away food orders.
InDaily reported yesterday that Sidewood Estate in the Adelaide Hills had begun offering takeaway food from its restaurant, which opened in January.
This morning Sidewood Estate owner Owen Inglis said he had to let go of four chefs as a result of the new measures, which allowed cafes to continue selling wine but not restaurants associated with cellar doors.
“Our winery is not at our physical winery, it’s not at our vineyard, so I cannot see how that differs to a restaurant or coffee shop. There is absolutely no difference,” he said.
“I laid off 34 casuals from the first closure of the restaurant and there’s no business for the bottling line because wineries aren’t putting money into getting it bottled at the moment. So we laid off more casuals and we had to stand down four permanent (staff) this morning.”
He said he didn’t believe the restaurant was entitled to the Federal Government’s $1500 “JobKeeper” stimulus package.
“Obviously this ‘stop and go’ approach is quite damaging … we only opened at the beginning of the year, so can’t show the 30 per cent drop month by month,” he said.
“To me, it would be a knee-jerk reaction to the spread of COVID-19 in the Barossa Valley. Obviously that has not occurred in any other region.
“There’s been a quick knee-jerk reaction without a consideration for what they’re doing.”
South Australian Wine Industry Association chief executive Brian Smedley said there was disquiet about the “blanket application” of the measures.
He said it would not stop wineries from producing wines but would make them more reliant on online sales.
“We can understand the reasoning about why this has been undertaken,” Smedley said.
“There has been some disquiet in terms of its application as a blanket application across the state – and we recognise what that’s about – but we also understand the need to make sure these types of premises are not open if people do continue to travel over Easter.
“It’s really about trying to create a situation where people can’t congregate… but it does have an impact on our industry and it is a cause of concern for businesses who are trying to do the right thing by keeping a business open and also keeping employment.”
Want to comment?
Send us an email, making it clear which story you’re commenting on and including your full name (required for publication) and phone number (only for verification purposes). Please put “Reader views” in the subject.
We’ll publish the best comments in a regular “Reader Views” post. Your comments can be brief, or we can accept up to 350 words, or thereabouts.
Make your contribution to independent news
A donation of any size to InDaily goes directly to helping our journalists uncover the facts. South Australia needs more than one voice to guide it forward, and we’d truly appreciate your contribution. Please click below to donate to InDaily.