The head of Funk Coffee & Food, Arthur Damaskos, led Benjamin Sebastino to believe that the Flinders Street Funk franchise produced $15,000 each week in turnover, translating to about $2000 in weekly profits, according to a Supreme Court judgment handed down this month.
But, in fact, the store rarely made that much money.
And although the corporate entity Hype Investments – owned by Benjamin and Mardi Sebastiano – bought Funk Flinders Street for $350,000 in June 2009, the court assessed its true value at the time of purchase as $120,000.
In an earlier judgment in the same case, handed down in July this year, the District Court found that Damaskos had misled Benjamin Sebastino, and that he would not have bought the business, nor paid the franchising and associated fees, had he known the café’s true financial position.
In the year before the café was purchased in mid-2009, it made less than $13,000 each week on average.
“The plaintiffs (Sebastino and Hype Investments) have proven that misrepresentations were made as to average weekly turnover of around $15,000 per week,” the judgment reads.
“The misleading and deceptive conduct caused the plaintiffs to enter into the sale and franchise agreements and the licence to occupy…
“Those misrepresentations were calculated to induce Mr Sebastiano to enter into the contracts, and so the fair inference is that he was induced to do so.”
Sebastino had been working as a sales representative, earning about $1000 a week, before he bought the café, and gave evidence that he would have kept his job had he known the café’s true financial position.
The court found that acquiring a business that earned Sebastino less than his wage at the time would have been “obviously unappealing”.
Supreme Court Judge Sydney Tilmouth ruled that Damaskos and Funk Coffee & Food should pay Sebastino at least $372,371, including:
- $230,000 – being the difference between the true market value of the business and the amount Sebastino paid for it.
- $76,341 – in damages for lost wages.
- $66,030 – for transaction costs and consequential losses.
The judge declared the franchise agreement for the café unenforceable.
The court will now hear from the parties about the amount of interest that should be added to those figures and the payment of court costs.
Damaskos’ lawyer told InDaily his client intended to appeal.
“Further submissions are required to be made by the parties before (Judge Tilmouth) prior to final orders being entered,” said Frank Trimboli of WRP Legal.
“Once final orders are entered it is Funk’s intention to appeal.
“In the circumstances, it is inappropriate that any comment be made on the reasons delivered by the Judge.”
There are 15 Funk Coffee & Food franchises in SA, although they are largely run as separate businesses.
You can read the full judgment here.
InDaily contacted Sebastino’s solicitors, Haarsma Lawyers, for comment but did not receive a response.
CORRECTION: A previous version of this story mistakenly referred to the Supreme Court as the District Court.
Help our journalists uncover the facts
In times like these InDaily provides valuable, local independent journalism in South Australia. As a news organisation it offers an alternative to The Advertiser, a different voice and a closer look at what is happening in our city and state for free. Any contribution to help fund our work is appreciated. Please click below to donate to InDaily.