InDaily

Adelaide's independent news

Support

New university rules aim spotlight at foreign interference

News

Australian universities will have to name their research partners and financial donors under new rules to safeguard against foreign interference.

Print article

The Federal Government directive follows concerns about China’s influence in Australia and a 2018 cyber attack on the Australian National University, which was only revealed in June.

Political ties of research collaborators, the end goal of the research and the objectives of foreign governments will all be scrutinised under the changes.

The Group of Eight – a coalition of top-ranking Australian unis – warned making the guidelines mandatory would ruin research partnerships and increase red tape.

Universities would also have to review intellectual property rights and whether foreign military organisations might benefit under the guidelines.

The new rules were drawn up by universities and intelligence experts from the Department of Home Affairs and the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation.

Under the voluntary guidelines, universities will have to consider the “dual-use” of their research.

Earlier this year, University of Queensland researchers were found to be collaborating on facial recognition technology used by the Chinese government to surveil ethnic Uighurs.

The paper detailing the new guidelines does not list any penalties for universities found to be breaching the new rules.

Federal Education Minister Dan Tehan said the guidelines were about due diligence.

“We’ve got to make sure that we continue to adapt, because with the foreign interference threat at unprecedented levels, it will evolve,” Tehan told the ABC today.

Asked on Sky why the guidelines weren’t compulsory, Tehan said the best approach was a collaborative one.

“If we can get a change of culture on our campuses … that is the best way that we can ensure that we deal with the threat of foreign interference.”

The Go8 said it preferred the government’s inclusive approach over the “heavy-handed over-reach” approach used in the United States.

“[It] would have stifled academic freedom, ruined invaluable research partnerships and added regulatory burden and additional compliance,” chief executive Vicki Thomson said.

Thomson said in a statement “shifting geopolitical framework” raised a need for the new guidelines.

The paper doesn’t specifically name China and Tehan dodged questions on whether it had been responsible for the ANU hack.

The paper says foreign actors may be trying to influence Australian researchers through economic pressure, hacking or recruitment.

But the guidelines aren’t just aimed at staff, with universities asked to remind students of the risks of foreign interference.

Intelligence agencies would also work with universities to help them identify risks and respond.

Universities would also be required to list collaborators on the Foreign Influence Transparency Scheme.

– AAP

We value local independent journalism. We hope you do too.

InDaily provides valuable, local independent journalism in South Australia. As a news organisation it offers an alternative to The Advertiser, a different voice and a closer look at what is happening in our city and state for free. Any contribution to help fund our work is appreciated. Please click below to become an InDaily supporter.

Powered by PressPatron

More News stories

Loading next article

Subscribe to InDaily – it’s free!

South Australia’s locally owned, independent source of digital news.

Subscribe now and go in the monthly draw* for your chance to WIN a $100 Foodland voucher!

Subscribe free here

*Terms and conditions apply

Welcome back!

Did you know it’s FREE to subscribe?

Subscribe now and go in the monthly draw* for your chance to WIN a $100 voucher!

Subscribe

*Terms and conditions apply