The WikiLeaks founder appeared confused and mumbled during his case management hearing in the Westminster Magistrates Court, where his lawyer was denied extra time to prepare the case.
Assange seemed to struggle to remember his birth date when asked to give it at the beginning of Monday’s hearing.
He later admitted he did not fully understand what had occurred in court when asked by District Judge Vanessa Baraitser.
“Not really. I can’t think properly,” he mumbled, before adding that the US government had an unfair advantage in the case, and accused them of stealing his children’s DNA.
“I don’t understand how this is equitable. This superpower had 10 years to prepare for this case and I can’t access my writings. It’s very difficult where I am to do anything but these people have unlimited resources,” he said.
“They are saying journalists and whistleblowers are enemies of the people. They have unfair advantages dealing with documents. They (know) the interior of my life with my psychologist. They steal my children’s DNA. This is not equitable what is happening here.”
Assange, 48, has been held in London’s Belmarsh prison since his sensational April 11 arrest at the Ecuadorian embassy, where he had lived in asylum for almost seven years.
He has been charged in the US with 17 counts of spying and one count of computer hacking in relation to WikiLeaks’ release of thousands of classified Pentagon files regarding the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.
Assange’s barrister Mark Summers QC said Assange cannot be extradited for political offences.
“Our case will be that this is a political attempt to signal to journalists the consequences of publishing information. It is legally unprecedented,” he told the court.
Assange’s solicitors Birnberg Peirce later issued a statement further clarifying that extradition for political offences is “prohibited and unlawful” under the UK–US extradition treaty of 2003.
Summers said he was deeply concerned about Assange’s ability to prepare for his case, given he has had no computer access since his incarceration began.
He also explained that the case was growing increasingly complicated as new evidence came to light.
Earlier this month Spain’s National Court announced it was investigating whether a Spanish security firm spied on Assange in the embassy with hidden microphones and other devices.
The information was allegedly passed to Ecuadorean and US authorities.
“The American state had been actively engaged in intruding into privileged discussions between Mr Assange and his lawyers in the embassy, also unlawful copying of their telephones and computers (and) hooded men breaking into offices,” Summers said.
He told the court there had been “plans to kidnap and harm” Assange.
Summers asked Judge Baraitser to delay the extradition trial and to extend the length of the five-day hearing so his client could adequately prepare evidence.
But the judge told Assange that the court had no jurisdiction over the conditions of his imprisonment and said he would not be granted any more time.
Assange’s next case management hearing is on December 19 and a full extradition hearing is scheduled for February 25.
Want to comment?
Send us an email, making it clear which story you’re commenting on and including your full name (required for publication) and phone number (only for verification purposes). Please put “Reader views” in the subject.
We’ll publish the best comments in a regular “Reader Views” post. Your comments can be brief, or we can accept up to 350 words, or thereabouts.
InDaily has changed the way we receive comments. Go here for an explanation.
Local News Matters
Media diversity is under threat in Australia – nowhere more so than in South Australia. The state needs more than one voice to guide it forward and you can help with a donation of any size to InDaily. Your contribution goes directly to helping our journalists uncover the facts. Please click below to help InDaily continue to uncover the facts.