InDaily InDaily

Support independent Journalism Donate Subscribe
Support independent journalism

News

Australian fashion brands rated on ethics

News

If Australian fashion brands were rated on ethics over style, not even 10 per cent would score an A or A+.

Comments
Comments Print article

The 2018 Ethical Fashion Report has graded 114 apparel companies, revealing Australian brands have achieved a median C rating, closing the gap on their overseas counterparts (median score of B-) for transparency in global supply chains and workers’ rights.

The Baptist World Aid Australia annual report, published today, comes a week before the fifth anniversary of the Rana Plaza factory collapse that killed more than 1100 people in Bangladesh in 2013 and sparked a push for change in safety standards across the industry.

Since the factory collapse, the fashion industry has made some headway in improving supply chain transparency, with 35 per cent of companies now publishing full direct supplier lists, according to the report.

In comparison, brands fared badly on tackling workers’ rights with only five per cent able to prove they were paying all their workers a living wage. A further 12 per cent showed they were paying some of their workers a living wage, while 70 per cent of the industry is yet to take significant action to improve worker wages, the report showed.

Out of the 61 Australian fashion brands listed, eight flunked with an F rating, including Bras N Things, Decjuba, Ally Fashion and Wish Designs, because they did not participate in the survey. (Baptist World Aid Australia says they believe it’s important to rank companies even when they do not respond to the research process.)

Decjuba on Wednesday rejected the F rating, pointing out it was a non-participant in the survey.

“The ratings system is based on information submitted by participating companies and the Baptist World Aid research team do not conduct site inspections to verify these details,” it said in a statement.

“Each of our factories is audited by an external regulator, and our team visit the factories that we partner with to ensure that our code of conduct is being upheld.”

On the top of the list, niche brands dominated with three A+ scores going to Etiko, Mighty Good Group and Outland Denim.

But some players within the fast fashion industry – which is synonymous with cheap labour and environmental pollution – have worked hard to improve their practices, and report card.

Baptist World Aid Advocacy Manager Gershon Nimbalker says a number of brands have been spurred to change, such as Cotton On, which scored an A on the report and topped the list for multinationals headquartered in Australia.

Other fast fashion brands such as Kmart, Jeanswest and Target all scored either a B or B+.

“When we first started the reports (2013), Aussies were well behind their international brands, but it was a wake up call for the industry,” Nimbalker told AAP.

“We’ve seen them playing a pretty impressive game of catch up.

“Cotton On is one of the most iconic examples, they’ve worked closely with us to push themselves forward.”

Nimbalker said consumers should vote with their wallet, checking the report for company scorecards.

“If their favourite brands aren’t doing enough, it’s a great opportunity to reach out to them.”

– AAP

Make a comment View comment guidelines

Help our journalists uncover the facts

In times like these InDaily provides valuable, local independent journalism in South Australia. As a news organisation it offers an alternative to The Advertiser, a different voice and a closer look at what is happening in our city and state for free. Any contribution to help fund our work is appreciated. Please click below to donate to InDaily.

Donate here
Powered by PressPatron

Comments

Show comments Hide comments
Will my comment be published? Read the guidelines.

More News stories

Loading next article