Federal Liberal MP David Coleman, who holds the NSW seat of Banks, said overhauling the electoral cycle by pursuing his private bill would deliver businesses and consumers much greater certainty.
“A fixed four-year term reduces the impact of short-term political drama and allows for a more strategic approach to decision making,” he wrote in an opinion piece published by Fairfax Media on Tuesday.
“Economic activity would increase. Business and consumers tend to hold off on investment during election periods and the phoney war that precedes them.”
Senior Labor frontbencher Penny Wong said she was concerned by the prospect of senators being elected for two four-year terms, which would flow from the changes under existing conventions.
“It leads to an eight-year term without facing the people and I think we should face them a bit more often than that,” she told ABC radio.
Labor supports constitutional change to allow simultaneous, fixed four-year terms for both the House of Representatives and the Senate.
“I think that many of the longer-term decisions governments have to make – some of the challenges governments have to meet – would benefit from a longer time-frame,” Wong said.
Coleman said Australia’s unfixed three-year terms – which usually ran for about 2.5 years at the discretion of the prime minister – were out of step with the rest of the world.
Overhauling the cycles would also deliver greater consistency with most states that have fixed terms.
Under the changes, an election could only be held outside the four-year cycle through a double dissolution of both houses of parliament or a successful motion of no confidence against the government in the lower house.
Coleman has consulted with constitutional expects and wants the bill to be legislated before a referendum is held at the next election.
“Constitutional change is a tough road to go down, but when the benefits are so great, we should pursue it with all vigour,” he said.
– AAPJump to next article